Why is UEFA threatening FIFA boycott? Infantino’s World Cup plan explained
Al Jazeera · LC · trust 50/100
play Live Sign up Show navigation menu Navigation menu News Show more news sections Africa Asia US & Canada Latin America Europe Asia Pacific Middle East Explained Sport Opinion Video More Show more sections Features Economy Human Rights Climate Crisis Investigations Interactives In Pictures Science & Technology Podcasts Travel Sponsored Content play Live Click here to search search Sign up Navigation menu caret-left World Cup 2026 Match Schedule Knockout Bracket Group Standings caret-right Sport | World Cup Why is UEFA threatening FIFA boycott? Infantino’s World Cup plan explained Al Jazeera looks at the growing global opposition for FIFA president Gianni Infantino’s private investment plan.
x whatsapp-stroke copylink google Add Al Jazeera on Google info FIFA President Gianni Infantino, right, and UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin head up bodies at odds over World Cup plans [File: Fernando Calistro/AP] By Kevin Hand Published On 31 Jul 2026 31 Jul 2026 The people’s game is facing a civil war.
Football – so often also dubbed ‘the beautiful game’ – is on the verge of an ugly standoff that threatens an established order that has stood since FIFA’s governance of the game began in 1904.
FIFA’s proposal, fronted by its President Gianni Infantino, to sell stakes in the World Cup and other events to private investors has been met with a furious backlash worldwide.
In the days that have followed, the sport has made headlines around the world and faced a split in the game with boycotts threatened.
Al Jazeera Sport takes a look at where and how football has gone from a celebration of World Cup glory for Spain to a divide that has provoked fierce words from the continental governing bodies, politicians and a resigning FIFA adviser alike.
FIFA has staged World Cups every four years since 1930, breaking only for World War Two.
The tournament has expanded from 13 teams competing at the inaugural event to a record 48 that lined up at World Cup 2026. That number could swell to 64 for the 2030 edition.
That in itself has drawn debate, but on Tuesday Infantino revealed a proposal to sell minority stakes in the World Cup, along with other events such as the FIFA Club World Cup, to private investors.
The plan would centre around an investment firm attracting private funding.
The expectation is that Joshua Kushner, the founder of Thrive Capital, would lead the proposed investor group via a fund called Thrive Eternal. Joshua is the brother of Jared Kushner, son-in-law of United States President Donald Trump.
Infantino has given the organisation’s 211-member federations until September 19 to support the private investment proposal.
The response to FIFA’s plans has been damning.
European football’s governing body, UEFA, voted on Thursday to boycott FIFA – and with it future World Cups – unless all plans to seek private investment for minority stakes in the governing body’s events were dropped immediately.
UEFA is made up of 55 nations and its vote was unanimous.
The organisation based in Switzerland, which is also home to FIFA, cited its concern that it was “irresponsible and indefensible that a proposal of such significance for football was conceived in secret”.
“The World Cup cannot be treated as an investment product. It is one of football’s greatest sporting legacies. It has been built over generations by players, national teams and supporters across every continent.
“No part of it should ever be surrendered to private investors. The World Cup is not for sale,” the statement said.
CONCACAF, the regional bloc for North America, Central America and the Caribbean, also rejected FIFA’s proposal during a meeting on Thursday.
It stopped short, however, of following UEFA’s plan to boycott World Cups.
CONCACAF, made up of 41 member associations, expressed “deep concerns” about the lack of due process surrounding the proposal, the short deadline and absence of any review or approval by relevant FIFA governance bodies.
“The discussion reinforced the need for greater transparency and proper governance,” it said in a media release. “For these reasons, CONCACAF and its 41 Member Associations have: Rejected the proposal.”
The Asian Football Confederation has also spoken out strongly against FIFA’s plans and have backed the stances taken by UEFA and CONCACAF, but they too have stopped short of voting to boycott events staged by the governing body.
“The fact that the situation has reached the point where the real possibility of a FIFA World Cup boycott has entered public discourse should concern everyone who cares about the future of our game,” the AFC said in a statement on Friday.
“Football should never have been placed in such a position.”
The Mexican Football Federation (FMF) has said it would study the proposal before deciding its position.
The FMF said FIFA had informed it of the proposal on July 28 and would provide member associations with additional information and documentation through a series of round tables before a decision is made.
“The FMF will complete this process of study and analysis in order to take the decision that best serves the development of Mexican football,” the federation added in a statement, without saying whether it supported CONCACAF’s decision to reject the proposal.
FIFA still await any footballing organisation to come out in support of its proposals.
The remaining continental governing bodies that have still to make their positions clear are the Confederation of African Football (CAF), the South American Football Confederation (CONMEBOL) and the Oceania Football Confederation (OFC).
It is not known whether they have set a date for a vote among their members on FIFA’s plan.
FIFA has blamed the media and doubled down on pursuing the project which now seems to have a majority of the 211 in opposition.
“Our planned consultation process was disrupted by incorrect media reports,” FIFA said…
Read the original at Al Jazeera →
Open in TruthVane →