Meta settlement aims to protect kids. Much more is needed, experts say.
Christian Science Monitor · C · trust 46/100
| Noah Berger/AP Dawson Kelly holds a banner with names of young people who advocates say died as a result of social media, outside the Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building in Oakland, California, Aug. 18, 2026. Loading...
Expanded parental control on Instagram and Facebook. A ban on certain beauty filters. Two-hour daily time limits for users under 18. These are some of the requirements Meta leadership agreed to in a $17.1 billion historic settlement with nearly every state in the nation. Meta says these sweeping changes are a safety overhaul intended to protect children.
Probably not, some digital safety researchers and advocates say.
Meta agreed to new rules for minors on its social platforms as part of a legal settlement. Children’s advocates say another key role in online safety for kids belongs to parents.
“All these commitments to make the platform better hinge on age verification,” says Mimi Ito, a cultural anthropologist and learning scientist at the University of California, Irvine. “Teens will find a way around it.” How Meta will verify users’ ages is among the still unanswered questions.
Other children will also just migrate to other platforms that don’t have restrictions, says Anne Collier, founder and executive director of the U.S.-based nonprofit The Net Safety Collaborative.
“Children’s digital experience ebbs and flows constantly,” and putting restrictions on one platform is not going to make them safe, says Ms. Collier, who has served as an adviser to Meta since 2009, for which her nonprofit receives a stipend. “There will always be bad actors moving in dark places where kids can go, unfortunately. That’s why it’s so important for parents and caregivers to be in good communication – curious, open-hearted, open-minded communication – with their children.”
It’s unclear whether other social media platforms will follow suit.
C.J. Mahoney, Meta’s chief legal officer, said in a statement Wednesday that the framework would only work if other platforms, including TikTok and YouTube, take similar steps. “Because teens move fluidly across dozens of apps, we need an industry-wide solution.”
Brian Snyder/Reuters Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell speaks to reporters after Meta Platforms and state attorneys general announced a settlement of a lawsuit accusing the social media giant of deliberately designing Facebook and Instagram to be addictive to young users, in Boston, Aug. 26, 2026. As part of the settlement – which resolves claims against the company brought by 47 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories, including a landmark trial that had commenced in California last week – Meta agreed to pay a minimum of $11.7 billion over a decade to the states. Meta agreed to pay another $5 billion if TikTok, YouTube and Snapchat ended up settling state claims on similar terms.
In the lawsuit, state attorneys general alleged that the company helped fuel a child mental health crisis. Meta Platforms, which owns Facebook and Instagram, among other social media platforms, denied any wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
There is evidence suggesting that banning social media or setting restrictions on social media companies doesn’t tend to work.
Exhibit A is Australia, which imposed a nationwide ban on social media for children under 16 on Dec. 10, 2025, becoming the first country in the world to implement such a restriction.
Months later, indications show that the law has largely failed, according to data from Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, the regulatory agency tasked with enforcing the law. According to a report in March , 7 in 10 parents whose children already had an account said the teens were still on one of the age-restricted platforms.
“The majority of teens are not complying with the ban,” says Dr. Ito, who has kept close watch on Australia’s ban. “The reality is that social media has become the essential way kids do their everyday social life. Even schooling and a lot of other things are mediated through the platforms. It’s difficult to take away something that has become essential infrastructure.”
Deepen your worldview with Monitor Highlights.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads .
There's a world of new ideas in every Books newsletter .
There’s more to life, enrich yours with Culture & Learning weekly.
Follow humanity’s discoveries with Science & Nature stories in your inbox.
Gain a spiritual perspective from the stories in your inbox.
Want to understand the deeper impact of critical events? Learn the Monitor’s insight.
Get the Monitor Stories you care about delivered to your inbox.
Thank you for signing up for a free Monitor Newsletter!
Ms. Collier, who also runs NetFamilyNews and piloted a social media helpline for schools in California, says laws are a “very clumsy” means of keeping kids safe.
“It’s like a blunt instrument, if it treats all children as equally at risk. It’s simply not the case. It’s not a monolithic population,” Ms. Collier says.
Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.
Our work isn't possible without your support.
We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.
Read the original at Christian Science Monitor →
Open in TruthVane →