What's bogging down the data center trade has nothing to do with demand
CNBC · C · trust 52/100
Livestream Menu Make It select USA INTL Livestream Search quotes, news & videos Livestream Watchlist SIGN IN Create free account Markets Business Investing Tech Politics & Policy Video Watchlist Investing Club PRO Livestream Menu
What's bogging down the data center trade has nothing to do with demand Published Sun, Aug 23 2026 6:55 PM EDT Jim Cramer @jimcramer Nine thousand people working long hours, six days a week, to meet a deadline for full production of memory chips by the first quarter of 2027. The workers know they can each make $200,000, maybe more. They seem united in their mission; no Potemkin village going up in Boise, Idaho. Just two state-of-the-art fabs for the number three producer of dynamic random access memory (DRAM), Micron . All for one reason: Demand for DRAM is so strong that this proud American company — which stuck with memory-chip manufacturing even as peers, including Intel, closed U.S. factories — needs to get more chips into data centers as quickly as possible. Sanjay Mehrotra, Micron's CEO since 2017, does not want his company to be the bottleneck in the great AI build-out in the U.S. and around the world. He cares passionately about how well Micron is doing, how many thousands of patents this innovative company amasses, and how specialized and powerful his semiconductors are, especially high-bandwidth devices. Mehrotra hears the argument from influential voices, including Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, that the balance of power in the data center buildout is shifting toward DRAM makers. Maybe he reads the postings. But one look at the commitment you see in Boise, the kind of job you might think could only be done by China's fabled Eighth Route Army, tells you he doesn't want that kind of chokehold power. Sanjay, as everyone knows him, would rather have it stem from better, more powerful chips and the proprietary intellectual property they contain. He wants to take share from Samsung and the all-powerful SK Hynix, rather than wield the de facto power that comes from being a bottleneck. He wants to beat the Koreans, not hold Musk or any other hungry data center or neo-hyperscaler CEO hostage to tight memory supply. He believes Micron can do that even as its rivals make their chips in the obviously lower-cost geographies. Sure, the U.S. is a higher-cost producer. But Mehrotra says technology can make up the difference. Two massive fabs are taking shape in Boise, and their importance can't be overstated. On top of that, Micron is building two fabs in Clay, New York, near Syracuse, this time hiring both union and non-union employees, as in Boise. They could be tougher. Will the unions allow employees who want to work six days a week to do so? Will it matter that it's a CHIPS and Science Act project? How does that cut? Micron's putting up $100 billion here. Will the $6 billion that the government is putting up matter in this ten-year project? Mehrotra is hopeful. No matter what, I saw a true marvel when I visited Boise last week. There was a spirit at our luncheon that I have not seen in any of our site visits. They get the high stakes. I think they will deliver. Their cause seemed so meaningful to so many that I felt like a mental Lilliputian when I asked when he would start buying back stock in companies like Sandisk , Western Digital , and Seagate . Technically, he can't until December, when the CHIPS Act allows him to begin. However, he could say he was going to if he felt it was the right thing to do. He didn't seem to mind the recalcitrance of these other players even as they are the true bottlenecks. They have chosen to return shareholders' money rather than use it to build more plants. Perhaps they are mindful that, in the past, doing so left them with a surfeit of product and a valley of earnings, like the shadow of death. Mehrotra doesn't mind. He's on a mission to grow, and he is certainly growing, as befits the company's trillion-dollar status. The stakes are incredibly high for the U.S. to maintain its lead in data centers. It seems to be getting harder and harder in this election year. The governors of Texas and Pennsylvania, one solidly red state, the other a key battleground, have taken steps to slow things down. If this turns into something like the Biden administration's restrictions on new LNG export projects, these states risk losing future investment. Virginia, already home to some 250 data centers, might be willing to take more. But the opposition to data centers — projects backed by companies that will fold if communities make development difficult — now seems to know few bounds. There's a loose coalition of data center companies, but to me it's too loose. What's needed is a common code of conduct that puts cooperation ahead of naked competition if the U.S. is going to stay ahead. A president who says he would welcome data centers if he were a local politician, perhaps demanding that developers help pay for the infrastructure they require, doesn't do the job. That's laissez-faire, and laissez-faire just isn't working. Which brings me to last week. We saw what can happen when the data center thesis gets bogged down. We bought some GE Vernova because we thought it was down enough. That seemed like a decent bet at the beginning of the week. By the end, I wish we had sold it. Broadcom is helping to arrange debt financing to accelerate the AI buildout, something the market didn't mind but I sure did. I want Broadcom to use its capital to buy back stock as it falls. It still had $10 billion of authorized share repurchases as of May 3. I would have preferred a reload. But if that money instead led to more AI infrastructure being built, that may matter more, especially as many investors seem to be questioning the data center thesis. Corning and Qnity Electronics were standout losers, the latter with a personnel change well chronicled by my colleague Jeff Marks in his Homestretch. It was bad. Oh, and don't get me started on my favorite stock,…
Read the original at CNBC →
Open in TruthVane →