Iran war is exposing Europe’s military limits
Christian Science Monitor · C · trust 46/100
Our name is about honesty. The Monitor is owned by The First Church of Christ, Scientist, and we’ve always been transparent about that.
The church publishes the Monitor because it sees good journalism as vital to progress in the world. Since 1908, we’ve aimed “to injure no man, but to bless all mankind,” as our founder, Mary Baker Eddy, put it.
Here, you’ll find award-winning journalism not driven by commercial influences – a news organization that takes seriously its mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.
Get unlimited access to global news that cuts through the noise and brings perspectives you won’t get anywhere else.
Already a subscriber? Log in to hide ads .
Europe is unlikely to help President Donald Trump fight the Iran war. But it could help the United States end it with limited military pressure and diplomacy.
Petros Giannakouris/AP A Greek navy officer salutes in front of a Greek flag at the new French-built frigate HS Kimon docked at the Salamis naval station, near Athens, Greece, Jan. 29, 2026. Play Pause Share Shared content is always free to recipients. Copy link Copied! Font Size Share this story Copy Link Link copied
The European Union is grappling with some of the same frustrations facing President Donald Trump in his war against Iran: European leaders unwilling or simply unable to share military resources, even with each other.
In cases of war assistance, these resources – from warships to tanks – have sometimes been removed from service for reasons beyond the control of the U.S. or its allies. The Pentagon, for example, was forced to withdraw its B-1 long-range bombers last weekend from Royal Air Force base Fairford, about 100 miles west of London, following an alleged terrorist plot in which five men were arrested.
Meanwhile, along the Red Sea, Yemen’s Tehran-allied Houthi rebels have been stepping up attacks on European commercial ships transiting the Bab el-Mandeb Strait. This strategic waterway has become more important still as the war in Iran disrupts transit through the Strait of Hormuz, through which about one-fifth of the world’s oil has traditionally flowed.
High fuel prices and an Iran war stalemate give Europe an incentive to try to help end the conflict. But low defense spending has left Europe with weak naval resources.
To support defense, France, Greece, and Italy in 2024 launched Operation Aspides, a naval mission to protect the EU’s interests in the Red Sea and surrounding trade corridors, including escorting commercial ships.
But as the Middle East conflict has widened, amid renewed Houthi strikes, Europe is feeling pressure to do more. The U.S.- and Israel-led mission still lacks ships, but defense spending cuts have left much of the continent with weak navies. That is raising frustrations in European capitals and in the U.S. about what kind of credible military help Western allies can – and will – provide to help end the Iran war moving forward.
European Union's Operation Aspides/AP/File This photo released by the European Union's Operation Aspides shows fires burning aboard the oil tanker Sounion in the Red Sea, Aug. 25, 2024. Indeed, for months now there has been a sense that Europe would “never act in the Middle East” because of resentment over what they see as President Trump’s “dumpster fire” of a war with Iran, says Edward P. Joseph, senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Institute , a nonpartisan think tank in Washington.
Yet with rising fuel prices and other interests at stake, Europe is increasingly pushing for action, including possibly using “psychological leverage” that could pressure Iran to negotiate, Mr. Joseph says.
“That’s what’s needed to end this thing,” he adds. “Europeans no longer have the luxury of ‘letting the Americans deal with the Iran problem they created.’”
Shortly after the war started, France and Britain began assembling a multinational force to provide security in the Strait of Hormuz – to be deployed once the war is over.
More than 20 countries have signed on, but in an effort to spur European action sooner, NATO’s Supreme Allied Headquarters in August convened a “group of interested allies … to facilitate their possible contributions in support of freedom of navigation” in the region “before the French and U.K.-led initiative, the Multinational Military Mission, commences,” Col. Martin O’Donnell, A NATO spokesperson, told The Monitor in a text message.
Meanwhile, Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto expressed frustration last month with fellow Europeans over their lack of contributions to Operation Aspides. “We need more ships,” he said in a Reuters interview. “The only nations really supporting [the efforts] are Italy and Greece.”
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas seconded this sentiment in a letter last month to Europe’s 27 member states asking for more resources for Aspides, to ensure the mission has the support of at least 10 ships.
Mr. Crosetto said that Italy planned to forge ahead with action, instead of waiting around for “European bureaucracy” or NATO countries to lead or devise a plan.
It doesn’t help, analysts add, that the EU is trying to gather ships for Aspides even as France and the United Kingdom have put together a separate initiative. Their Multinational Military Mission, an ad hoc coalition to clear mines and secure the Strait of Hormuz, is competing for European naval resources.
But it’s more than bureaucracy preventing European naval action in the region, analysts say. The EU, for starters, doesn’t have its own pool of European warships, so member states must voluntarily offer up their own. Some smaller European states have only one warship.
Other landlocked countries, like Austria and Hungary, have none. Malta, Cyprus, and Ireland have their own naval forces, but not the sort of frigates or destroyers needed for high-threat escort operations.
The effort behind missions such as Aspides is a step in the right direction,…
Read the original at Christian Science Monitor →
Open in TruthVane →