Trump Has Quietly Sought Control Over Postal Service to Transform U.S. Elections
New York Times · LC · trust 54/100
That effort got new attention on Monday, when the Supreme Court allowed preparations for mail voting curbs to proceed. The justices said it is not a final determination on the order’s legality.
Listen · 9:45 min Share full article President Trump and his allies are trying to transform the U.S. Postal Service into a key player in their efforts to transform the nation’s elections. Credit... Mario Tama/Getty Images By Zolan Kanno-Youngs Adam Sella and Nick Corasaniti
All four were Republicans. Three have expressed doubts about who won the 2020 presidential election and the security of voting.
The selections broke with a longstanding practice of nominating board members in bipartisan pairs. Two of those nominees are on a fast track for approval, and could reach a full Senate vote when the chamber returns from recess in September. If confirmed, their appointments would effectively tip the board to a majority that is loyal to Mr. Trump.
The quiet attempt to restructure the leadership of the Postal Service comes as the president and his allies are trying to transform the 251-year-old agency into a central player in their quest to overhaul the nation’s elections. Last year, Mr. Trump took an unusually active role directing the board of governors to select the current postmaster general, David Steiner. And the president has imposed a highly partisan agenda on a historically apolitical institution: restricting mail voting, a practice more heavily used by Democrats than Republicans, which Mr. Trump has publicly acknowledged would benefit his party.
Control of the Postal Service grew even more critical on Monday, after the Supreme Court ruled to allow the administration to move forward with plans to restrict mail-in voting before the midterm elections.
The justices cautioned that the decision was preliminary and should not be construed as a final determination on the legality of the order. It also remains unclear whether the administration can implement the restrictions in time for mail voting this year.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Read the original at New York Times →
Open in TruthVane →