The messy politics behind Google’s big AI shakeup
The Verge · LC · trust 50/100
Tech Close Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
AI Close AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Google’s AI leadership changes may have come down to pressure to speed up products — and internal ethical conflicts.
Hayden Field Close Hayden Field Senior AI Reporter Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Share Gift Google CEO Sundar Pichai at Google I/O. | Photo by Benjamin Fanjoy/Getty Images Tech Close Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
AI Close AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Policy Close Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Google’s AI leadership changes may have come down to pressure to speed up products — and internal ethical conflicts.
Hayden Field Close Hayden Field Senior AI Reporter Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Share Gift Hayden Field Close Hayden Field Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
In the AI industry, Google prides itself on seeming like the adult in the room: quiet, stable, time-tested. On Wednesday, even as the company announced its largest AI org shakeup yet, Google and its leaders presented a unified front, keeping their messaging focused on how the changes tee up future success.
But the reality is that the laundry list of executive changes likely signal deeper issues within Google’s AI organization. That starts with its tenuous position in the AI race, and it stretches to problems like Google DeepMind leader Demis Hassabis’ interest in longer-term research over shorter-term product shipping, as well as bubbling political opposition from top employees like DeepMind chief scientist Jeff Dean.
A current Google employee, who requested anonymity due to fear of retaliation, said one of the changes — Dean’s departure — is an example of “the vestiges of Google’s idealism” fully dying out. “Losing Jeff continues the brain drain at Google,” they said. “Mediocrity is the likely result.”
Wednesday’s news rocked the AI industry, which is difficult to do during an era when AI researchers are constantly switching between roles and labs like a game of musical chairs. Google announced that Demis Hassabis is stepping away from DeepMind’s day-to-day operations to focus on AGI and research; Koray Kavukcuoglu, DeepMind’s current CTO, will step up to lead DeepMind in Hassabis’ place. At the same time, Jeff Dean, a 27-year Google veteran and the company’s 30th employee, will leave the organization alongside three top Google AI researchers to form a new AI startup.
“Losing Jeff continues the brain drain at Google. Mediocrity is the likely result.”
Google is widely viewed as being the most successful of the established tech giants in the AI race, far surpassing progress by Meta, Amazon, and Apple. But Google is still viewed as slower-moving than OpenAI and Anthropic, and it certainly hasn’t lapped them in frontier models. Both Hassabis and Google CEO Sundar Pichai made that point in their statements.
“We are committed to being at the frontier, and are super focused on the areas where we need to improve,” Pichai wrote, adding, “We have to continue to move fast and with clear purpose here.” Hassabis wrote that the company is entering a “next chapter” and that it has “all the ingredients to lead from here, and I firmly believe we will.”
Key figures in the AI industry seemed to view the changes as Hassabis stepping to the side in favor of a faster-moving, product-focused push at GDM.
“There’s been far more internal competition at Google than I’ve seen in the last decade primarily around the AI product space,” one former Google employee, who recently left the company and had knowledge of Google’s AI operations, told The Verge . They added that there’s been pressure to hire more employees who can speed up launches of more products, in keeping with the intensifying competition.
“There’s been far more internal competition at Google than I’ve seen in the last decade primarily around the AI product space.”
Another source within the AI industry, who requested anonymity due to ongoing work with AI labs, said, “I agree with everyone’s read that this is a sign of Demis’ loss of influence.”
Hassabis hasn’t been quiet in sharing that his interests lie in the scientific advancements that could come from AI, perhaps more so than the commercialization of the technology. Pichai wrote in a blog post that Hassabis’ next move will focus on “actively shaping the future of AGI” as DeepMind chair and Alphabet’s chief scientist, while continuing his role leading the drug-discovery spinoff Isomorphic Labs .
But AI leadership is only one of the problems facing Google — and industry insiders The Verge spoke with kept coming back to one main question: How much of this had to do with increasing ethical conflicts within Google itself?
A contributing factor to both Hassabis’s role change and Dean’s departure may have been Google’s deal with the Department of Defense, Tyler Johnston, founder of the nonprofit AI industry watchdog The Midas Project, told The Verge . That deal could potentially allow for the use of Google AI in mass surveillance and lethal autonomous weapons.
“This has already caused staff departures and a unionization effort at DeepMind,” Johnston said. “There are many signs suggesting Dean and Hassabis may have personally felt opposed. In fact, DeepMind was initially acquired by Google with an agreement not to sell the technology for military or intelligence purposes.”
Zvi Mowshowitz, a blogger followed closely by AI researchers, echoed that Dean’s…
Read the original at The Verge →
Open in TruthVane →