Navi Pillay’s Nobel rewards the Israel genocide lie
Washington Examiner · RC · trust 35/100
This year’s Nobel Peace Prize winner, Navi Pillay , a South African woman of Indian descent, played a key role in her home country’s anti-apartheid movement and served as a judge on the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. But most recently, she led the U.N. commission that concluded Israel committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza .
Her colleagues at the United Nations cheered Pillay’s selection. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres praised Pillay as a “steadfast, independent voice of justice.”
Join Washington Examiner for unlimited access to the news, analysis, and commentary that matter most.
Hamas , meanwhile, hailed the award as an important step toward “international justice,” specifically applauding her commission’s accusations against Israel. Iranian state media were only too happy to amplify Hamas’s congratulations.
France also hailed the decision, stating, “Her career is a reminder that there is no lasting peace without justice.”
That word kept coming up: justice. But what does Pillay mean by justice?
Watchdog groups have spent years documenting Pillay’s singular focus on Israel, even while some of the world’s most brutal dictatorships escaped comparable scrutiny.
While Pillay served as U.N. high commissioner for human rights from 2008 to 2014, she empaneled four fact-finding missions targeting Israel, more than any other country. Pillay oversaw the now-discredited Goldstone Report, whose primary author later walked back its central allegation that Israel had deliberately targeted civilians as a matter of policy. Pillay also participated in the 2009 Durban II conference, which was boycotted by several democracies and provided Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a prominent platform to disseminate antisemitic vitriol.
In 2022, while chairing a U.N. commission of inquiry, Pillay rejected calls by the U.S. government for accountability after fellow commissioner Miloon Kothari questioned Israel’s membership in the U.N. and complained about the “Jewish lobby.”
UN Watch, an organization dedicated to monitoring the U.N., has long documented Pillay’s lopsided record on Israel. The organization went so far as to submit a 35-page request calling on Pillay to recuse herself from the commission of inquiry established by the United Nations Human Rights Council because of her inherent, well-documented bias.
UN Watch’s Hillel Neuer told the Washington Free Beacon , “Navi Pillay deserves the Nobel Peace Prize like the Ayatollah deserved to be elected to the U.N. women’s rights commission.”
Pillay’s focus on Israel has come at the expense of suffering people across the region and around the world. Even Palestinian women were ill-served by her Israel obsession. In 2005, Pillay affirmed a special rapporteur analysis that concluded that “occupation pressures” made Palestinian men more violent by stripping them of their ability to provide and protect, turning wives into targets of domestic violence.
Translated: Israel was being blamed for Palestinian men beating their wives.
UN Watch found that Pillay, while serving as U.N. human rights chief, stayed silent on abuses in Cuba, North Korea, Eritrea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Belarus, and Syria during her first two years in office.
Pillay has also repeatedly shown a willingness to accommodate the demands of Islamists. In 2008, while serving as U.N. high commissioner for human rights, she advised the Danish government to address “defamation of religion” as Islamic states pushed for restrictions on speech deemed offensive to religion.
Several years later, in 2012, Pillay criticized the French cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo for being “malicious and provocative” in their depictions of Muhammad.
Those cartoonists would be massacred by Islamists just a few years later.
But it is Pillay’s accusation of genocide against Israel that makes this Nobel especially consequential.
Raphael Lemkin, the Polish Jew who coined the word “genocide,” lost most of his family in the Holocaust. He spent the rest of his life giving the world a word — and eventually a legal framework — for the deliberate destruction of a people.
Now some of the world’s most powerful institutions are using their muscle to lend legitimacy to activists who have weaponized Lemkin’s word against the world’s only Jewish state.
The Nobel Prize does more than honor Pillay. It lends the Nobel Committee’s prestige to her accusation. It tells the world that calling Israel’s war against Hamas a genocide is not merely one deeply contested interpretation of international law, but work worthy of the world’s most famous peace prize.
Lemkin’s own family has been warning about exactly this transformation.
Earlier this year, I wrote about their fight with the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, an organization that has repeatedly accused Israel of genocide while using Raphael Lemkin’s name to give those accusations moral and historical authority.
Joseph Lemkin, a relative of Raphael Lemkin, told the Washington Examiner :
“Calling Israel’s war against Hamas ‘genocide’ while dismissing evidence of efforts to warn civilians, facilitate evacuations and provide aid is a terrible choice with consequences far beyond this conflict. Civilian suffering demands compassion and accountability. But the legal accusation of genocide requires evidence of an intent to destroy a protected group, and that standard cannot be replaced by outrage or political conviction.”
The definition of genocide does not have to be formally rewritten to render it meaningless. Activists can stretch its application, international bodies can endorse that application, and prestigious institutions can reward the people doing it. Eventually, the accusation itself acquires the imprimatur of authority.
That is what makes the Nobel Committee’s decision so significant.
“Raphael Lemkin devoted his life to ensuring the world could identify and confront genocide,” Joseph Lemkin said. “When his name is used to lend…
Read the original at Washington Examiner →
Open in TruthVane →