Publishers sue Google over alleged use of books to train AI models
France 24 · LC · trust 53/100
Book publishers sued Google on Tuesday, accusing the tech giant of illegally using copyrighted works to train its artificial intelligence models and generate content that competes with human authors. The lawsuit marks the latest legal battle over how AI developers use books and other creative works to build their systems.
By: FRANCE 24 People arrive to the recently opened Google building in New York on February 26, 2024. © Seth Wenig, AP Multiple book publishers sued Google on Tuesday for allegedly stealing copyrighted content, using it to train artificial intelligence (AI) models and then generating content that "directly" competes with the original authors' work .
"The scale and speed at which Gemini can create books and compete with human writers is unprecedented," the lawsuit says.
The lawsuit , which requests class action status, was filed in New York by Hachette Book Group, Cengage Learning, Elsevier, author Scott Turow and his publishing company S.C.R.I.B.E.
They allege that " Google secretly copied millions of works" that were provided to Google Books and other services for "limited purposes" and then used that content to train Gemini, its AI model.
Furthermore, they claim the content generated by Gemini directly competes with the authors who wrote the original work.
"Gemini even tailors outputs to mimic the expressive elements and creative choices of specific authors," the lawsuit says.
Read more Could a controversial award-winning short story signal a new era of literary 'AI slop'?
The plaintiffs requested an injunction and an unspecified amount of damages.
It's the latest copyright infringement lawsuit brought against AI developers.
In May, multiple publishers – including Hachette, Cengage, Elsevier and Turow – sued Meta on similar grounds in a New York court.
A US judge in September approved a $1.5 billion settlement between Anthropic and several authors who claimed the San Francisco company illegally copied their work to train its AI model, Claude.
It was a partial victory for Anthropic – a judge ruled that the company's use of books to train Claude was transformative enough to constitute "fair use" under US law but that other uses of pirated materials were not.
Meta also won a partial victory last year when a US judge in San Francisco ruled that its use of copyrighted materials was "fair use". That case was filed by comedian Sarah Silverman, author Ta-Nehisi Coates and others.
How jihadist groups like Boko Haram use AI for acts of terror Analysis Africa FIFA World Cup: Fake racism videos go viral as players, fans face real abuse Sport Today's top stories
© 2026 Copyright France 24 - All rights reserved. France 24 is not responsible for the content of external websites. Audience ratings certified by ACPM. ACPM
Read the original at France 24 →
Open in TruthVane →